In recent arising news, foreign mInisters from South Korea and Japan had a meeting to discuss their impact of strengthening their relationship, from the cause of recent arising security issues and political dilemmas in countries surrounding them as well as the President of South Korea Choi Sang-mok recent attractions of disruption in the country. Despite their ongoing political tension, they have recently found common ground in the face of a recent spike of concerns.Such as North Korea’s missile tests and China’s ongoing expansion of miliary.The foreign ministers have made it one of their main priorities to commit to regional stability in both countries and reach out for a new framework of a trilateral security between the United States, South Korea and Japan, this cooperation is vital to both of these countries to control those regional threats.
This meeting that was conducted between South Korra and Japan shows a major shift in East Aisan geopolitics, as for these countries have has long historical tensions. This cooperation that these two countries want to create with the US is leading to a unification between global states, enhancing future military coordination and intelligence sharing. Some lasting impacts this could have between South Korea and Japan is to show the improvement of cooperation and could potentially foster greater diplomatic stability and expand the economic cooperation between both countries. Overall this could have a major shift in diplomacy, as well it can reshape the security dynamics in East Asia especially in relation to China and North Korea. These concerns could have long-term implications for regional stability, especially global security alliances.
Identity Politics is brought into light in this article as both counties South Korea and Japan are seeking security but also ensuring they do not lose power to China or North Korea making it a relatively good identity. There concern in cooperation is driven by desire to both maintain balance in the region although they had their differences in the past, It shows that both countries want to ensure their security with disproportionate advantages to their allies. In conclusion this article reflects how countries balance the theory of constructivism and common goods, with strategic ways to shape their foreign policy and regional cooperation.