{"id":225,"date":"2016-10-19T13:18:04","date_gmt":"2016-10-19T13:18:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/?p=225"},"modified":"2016-10-19T13:19:16","modified_gmt":"2016-10-19T13:19:16","slug":"china-pakistan-economic-corridor-might-become-like-east-india-co-say-pakistans-senators","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/2016\/10\/19\/china-pakistan-economic-corridor-might-become-like-east-india-co-say-pakistans-senators\/","title":{"rendered":"China-Pakistan Economic Corridor might become like East India Co, say Pakistan&#8217;s senators"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NEW DELHI: Several Pakistan senators have expressed grave fears that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor+ (CPEC) could turn into another rapacious East India Company if the country&#8217;s interests aren&#8217;t actively protected , Dawn reported.<br \/>\nWhat the senators were specifically worried about is the perception that local financing is being used for CPEC-related projects, instead of monies from the Chinese or from other foreign investments.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n&#8220;It will be very harmful for us if we have to bear the entire burden; will this [project] be a national development or a national calamity? Whatever loans taken from China will have to be paid by the poor people of Pakistan,&#8221; senator Saeedul Hassan Mandokhail reportedly said, at a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development, Dawn reported.<br \/>\nMandokhail compared the project to The East India Co., which was, of course, Britain&#8217;s trading mission to India and the precursor to British imperial rule over the subcontinent.<br \/>\n&#8220;Another East India Company is in the offing; national interests are not being protected. We are proud of the friendship between Pakistan and China, but the interests of the state should come first,&#8221; said senator Tahir Mashhadi, chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development.<br \/>\nWho fixes tariffs?<br \/>\nOther areas of major concern are the power tariffs the Chinese will fix for CPEC-related power projects, as well as the fact that some believe that the Gadani power project, a 6,000 megawatt plant, is not part of the CPEC.<br \/>\nPakistan&#8217;s National Energy Power Regulatory Authority approved tariff for the project at 71 paise per unit, while Chinese investors are demanding a whopping 95 paise per unit. As for the Gadani plant, Kakar claimed that the Chinese Ambassador to Pakistan had recently asserted that it was indeed a part of the corridor.<br \/>\n&#8220;Why is this project, which does not even exist, being counted in our account?&#8221; Kakar asked.<br \/>\nAnd last but not least of the senators&#8217; concerns is that CPEC&#8217;s infrastructure &#8211; being established in Gwadar &#8211; would only benefit the Chinese and Punjab province governments, and not the beleaguered province of Balochistan.<br \/>\n&#8220;The people of Balochistan will only get one benefit from this project, which is the water supply,&#8221; Kakar reportedly said, adding that no electricity or railway projects had been planned for Balochistan under the CPEC.<\/p>\n<p>Mandokhail said that smaller provinces were feeling deprived. He accused the country&#8217;s Planning Commission of prioritising Balochistan very low on its list.<br \/>\n&#8220;We do not want the CPEC at the cost of the federation,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW DELHI: Several Pakistan senators have expressed grave fears that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor+ (CPEC) could turn into another rapacious East India Company if the country&#8217;s interests aren&#8217;t actively protected , Dawn reported. What the senators were specifically worried about is the perception that local financing is being used for CPEC-related projects, instead of monies from the Chinese or from&#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/2016\/10\/19\/china-pakistan-economic-corridor-might-become-like-east-india-co-say-pakistans-senators\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":227,"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225\/revisions\/227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/baileyonlineclassroom.com\/southandcentralasiablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}