Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

Link To Article: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c30q09638n8o

The article goes over the decades-long conflict between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir region. Since the 1947 partition of British India, Kashmir has been disputed, with both countries claiming it in full but controlling only parts. The conflict has sparked several wars and deadly skirmishes, including recent escalations like India’s 2025 missile strikes following a deadly militant attack. The area remains heavily militarized, and residents, many of whom are Muslim, hold diverse views on independence or allegiance. India revoked Kashmir’s semi-autonomous status in 2019, adding to tensions. Despite brief ceasefires and peace efforts, lasting resolution remains elusive.

This article is important because it highlights a longstanding flashpoint between two nuclear powers in a volatile region. The unresolved Kashmir conflict not only endangers regional stability but also has global implications. The 2025 escalation shows how fragile the peace is, even after periods of calm. The struggle is rooted in identity, religion, and historical injustice. India’s actions, like revoking Kashmir’s autonomy, fuel resentment and unrest, while Pakistan’s alleged support of militants complicates resolution. The situation demands international attention because future violence could spiral quickly. A lack of trust and deep-rooted nationalism on both sides makes peace extremely difficult.

India may continue asserting control through military operations and political measures like stripping autonomy. Pakistan is likely to condemn Indian actions on global platforms and may respond militarily or via proxy groups. Kashmiri civilians might protest or call for international intervention, desiring independence or restored autonomy. The United Nations or other diplomatic actors could attempt mediation, though past efforts have failed. Extremist groups might exploit the unrest, increasing violence. For any real change, all parties would need to compromise: India easing crackdowns, Pakistan halting militant support, and both restarting talks. Without trust-building steps, further instability seems likely.

This conflict directly connects to international relations themes of sovereignty, nationalism, and security dilemmas. It illustrates realism, where states prioritize power and survival—India and Pakistan both act in national self-interest. The Kashmir situation also relates to theories of conflict resolution and the limits of international law, as UN efforts have not succeeded. It exemplifies identity-based conflict and how colonial legacies (partition) continue shaping modern politics. The balance of power between nuclear states and the role of non-state actors (militants) reflect current global tensions we discuss in class. Kashmir is a live example of complex, multi-level geopolitical conflict.

Leave a Reply