Article: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-55177688
In 2017, the Rohingya muslim group began fleeing Myanmar after a violent military crackdown. Ever since, thousands have lived within refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Recently, Bangladesh has begun relocating these refugees to the island of Bhashan Char. Officials from Bangladesh claim that all refugees gave their consent; however, earlier this year many refugees publicly stated they were not on board with the relocation. As a result, human rights groups have concerns about whether this was against the freewill of the refugees. The Human Rights Watch claimed to have interviewed 12 families who didn’t volunteer to move.
The decision to relocate the Rohingya may have lasting effects on the reputation of Bangladesh in the international community. The United Nations had raised concerns before relocation had begun. They have now stated that the organization didn’t review the plans. Although Bangladesh has the ability to decide domestic policy on their own, some may be frustrated due to their lack of communication. The UN is made up of some extremely powerful countries that would be dangerous to make upset, including the US and China.
Through a realist perspective, this decision was Bangladesh acting in their own national interest. Although the United Nations provides funding for these refugees, Bangladesh may be losing interest because hosting refugees isn’t benefiting the state economically. Cox’s Bazar is a huge tourist location that is currently used to host the Rohingya. Also, a significant portion of the country’s population lives in poverty. When economic issues are present, aiding others unfortunately may not be an immediate concern. Thus, a realist may say this is a rational actor pursuing national interest.
Through a liberal perspective, Bangladesh was looking out for the safety of the camps by attempting to ease tensions that arise with overcrowding. This is supported by the fact that Bangladesh has been building on this island for years and actually spent $350m. However, Amnesty International reported the living conditions were cramped, dirty, and dangerous. Also, the island they moved the refugees to is prone to flooding and isn’t an ideal area. Bangladesh did not have clear motives, and this decision will likely be better understood in the years to come.